From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Austin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 23, 2013
548 F. App'x 943 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-2042

12-23-2013

In re: RANDOLPH HARRIS AUSTIN, a/k/a Randolph Harris, a/k/a Matarbus Raynard Fewell, Petitioner.

Randolph Harris Austin, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:05-cr-00213-RJC-DCK-1; 3:11-cv-00040-RJC) Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randolph Harris Austin, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Randolph Harris Austin petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Austin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 23, 2013
548 F. App'x 943 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

In re Austin

Case Details

Full title:In re: RANDOLPH HARRIS AUSTIN, a/k/a Randolph Harris, a/k/a Matarbus…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

Citations

548 F. App'x 943 (4th Cir. 2013)