From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 18, 2011
87 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

August 18, 2011.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1992, was suspended by this Court's order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 262 AD2d 702).

Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional, Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Stephen Leslie Jacques, Cheshire, Connecticut.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts ( see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 18, 2011
87 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 18, 2011

Citations

87 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6289
928 N.Y.S.2d 481