From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 21, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 4689 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

No. PM-127-22

07-21-2022

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Salvatore Anthony Barbatano, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4485660.)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Law Offices of Sarah Diane McShea, New York City (Sarah Diane McShea of counsel), for respondent.


Calendar Date: June 27, 2022

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Law Offices of Sarah Diane McShea, New York City (Sarah Diane McShea of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lynch, J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Fisher and McShan, JJ.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by October 2021 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 198 A.D.3d 1068, 1071 [2021]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion, the affidavit and reply affidavit with exhibits sworn to by respondent on January 28, 2022 and April 8, 2022, respectively, and upon reading the March 3, 2022 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Nenninger], 180 A.D.3d 1317, 1317-1318 [2020]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Lynch, J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Fisher and McShan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 21, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 4689 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 21, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 4689 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)