From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 16, 2023
221 A.D.3d 1240 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

No. PM-261-23

11-16-2023

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Meagan Elizabeth Hassan, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4570578.)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Law Offices of Sarah Diane McShea, New York City (Sarah Diane McShea of counsel), for respondent.


Calendar Date: November 6, 2023

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Law Offices of Sarah Diane McShea, New York City (Sarah Diane McShea of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Aarons, McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 172 A.D.3d 1706, 1727 [3d Dept 2019]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to September 28, 2023 and the November 2, 2023 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has satisfied the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (c) (5), (2) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (3) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (4) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Aarons, McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 16, 2023
221 A.D.3d 1240 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 16, 2023

Citations

221 A.D.3d 1240 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 5780
197 N.Y.S.3d 769