From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 30, 2020
179 A.D.3d 1437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

PM-30-20

01-30-2020

In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A. Heidi Sasha Mohammed, also known as Heidi Sasha Kirlew, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 5073267)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Heidi Sasha Mohammed, Hollywood, Florida, respondent pro se.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Heidi Sasha Mohammed, Hollywood, Florida, respondent pro se.

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by May 2019 order of this Court ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 172 A.D.3d 1706, 104 N.Y.S.3d 211 [2019] ; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 ; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [ 22 NYCRR] § 806.16 ).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion, affidavit with exhibits sworn to October 17, 2019, supplemental affidavit with exhibit sworn to January 9, 2020, and the responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department dated December 6, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stonner] , 175 A.D.3d 799, 103 N.Y.S.3d 881 [2019] ; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Dorsett] , 174 A.D.3d 1219, 102 N.Y.S.3d 897 [2019] ), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 30, 2020
179 A.D.3d 1437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Heidi…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 30, 2020

Citations

179 A.D.3d 1437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
114 N.Y.S.3d 891
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 667

Citing Cases

Attorney Grievance Comm. for the Third Judicial Dep't v. Komisar (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A)

Upon reading respondent's affidavit with exhibits sworn to October 12, 2021. Upon reading respondent's…

Attorney Grievance Comm. for the Third Judicial Dep't v. de Aponte (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A)

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by October…