From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 26, 2019
178 A.D.3d 1350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

PM-237-19

12-26-2019

In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A. Muthoni Wacieni Kaniaru, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 3891272)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Muthoni Wacieni Kaniaru, Silver Spring, Maryland, respondent pro se.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Muthoni Wacieni Kaniaru, Silver Spring, Maryland, respondent pro se.

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by May 2019 order of this Court ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 172 A.D.3d 1706, 1731, 104 N.Y.S.3d 211 [2019] ; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 ; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [ 22 NYCRR] § 806.16 ).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to September 19, 2019, the November 1, 2019 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department and respondent's supplemental submissions sworn to December 5, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Zerdan] , 173 A.D.3d 1602, 1603, 101 N.Y.S.3d 656 [2019] ; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski] , 164 A.D.3d 1049, 1051, 85 N.Y.S.3d 232 [2018] ), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Mulvey, Devine and Pritzker, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 26, 2019
178 A.D.3d 1350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Muthoni…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 26, 2019

Citations

178 A.D.3d 1350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
112 N.Y.S.3d 612
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 9349