From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 27, 2019
177 A.D.3d 1242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

PM–211–19

11-27-2019

In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A. Evgeny V. Astakhov, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 3015690)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Law Office of Alexander Sakin, LLC, New York (Alexander Sakin of counsel), for respondent.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Law Office of Alexander Sakin, LLC, New York (Alexander Sakin of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by May 2019 order of this Court ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a , 172 A.D.3d 1706, 1711, 104 N.Y.S.3d 211 [2019] ; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to August 9, 2019, the October 23, 2019 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department and respondent's supplemental submission dated November 14, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Zerdan] , 173 A.D.3d 1602, 1603, 101 N.Y.S.3d 656 [2019] ; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Serbinowski] , 164 A.D.3d 1049, 1050, 85 N.Y.S.3d 232 [2018] ), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 27, 2019
177 A.D.3d 1242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Evgeny…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 27, 2019

Citations

177 A.D.3d 1242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
111 N.Y.S.3d 254
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 53960