From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 7, 2023
222 A.D.3d 1101 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

No. PM-271-23

12-07-2023

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Now Known as Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Alaba Diekolola Adio, Also Known as Alaba Diekolola Akinyele, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 3934585.)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Alaba Diekolola Adio, Lagos, Nigeria, respondent pro se.


Calendar Date: November 20, 2023

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Alaba Diekolola Adio, Lagos, Nigeria, respondent pro se.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia and Mackey, JJ., concur.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by January 2014 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1022 [3d Dept 2014]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits filed September 5, 2023, supplemental filing sworn to November 14, 2023 and the October 19, 2023 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has satisfied the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (c) (5), (2) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (3) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (4) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia and Mackey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 7, 2023
222 A.D.3d 1101 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

In re Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 7, 2023

Citations

222 A.D.3d 1101 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 6303
199 N.Y.S.3d 301