From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department
Dec 30, 2021
No. 2021-07600 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2021-07600

12-30-2021

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Howard Dean Komisar, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 2299295.)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Michael J. Lendino, Harrison, for respondent.


Calendar Date:November 22, 2021

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Michael J. Lendino, Harrison, for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Aarons, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by October 2021 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 198 A.D.3d 1068, 1079 [2021]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's affidavit with exhibits sworn to October 12, 2021, and upon reading the responsive correspondence by the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department dated November 17, 2021, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Mohammed], 179 A.D.3d 1437 [2020]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stonner], 175 A.D.3d 799 [2019]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Aarons, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department
Dec 30, 2021
No. 2021-07600 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 30, 2021)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department

Date published: Dec 30, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-07600 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 30, 2021)