From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Vio. of Judiciary Law

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 24, 2011
81 A.D.3d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. Attorney Registration No. 2659811.

February 24, 2011.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995, was suspended by this Court's order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 273 AD2d 600).

Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Nicole J. Tung, New Haven, Connecticut, respondent pro se.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts ( see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Vio. of Judiciary Law

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 24, 2011
81 A.D.3d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Vio. of Judiciary Law

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2011

Citations

81 A.D.3d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1403
916 N.Y.S.2d 856