From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 8, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2256428.

November 8, 2007.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1989, was suspended by this Court's order dated November 20, 1998 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( 255 AD2d 827).

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Mario G. Aglipay, Quezon City, Philippines, respondent pro se.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ, concur.


Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) part 118. Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 8, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re Attorneys

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 8, 2007

Citations

45 A.D.3d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 8349
843 N.Y.S.2d 922