From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Astec Underground

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Feb 3, 2011
No. 13-11-00065-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. 13-11-00065-CV

Delivered and filed February 3, 2011.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices RODRIGUEZ and PERKES.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator, Astec Underground, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion to stay proceedings in the above cause on February 2, 2011, seeking to compel the trial court to withdraw its order of January 31, 2011, as well as its ruling of February 1, 2011, permitting the de-designation of an expert witness.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought. See Tom L. Scott, Inc. v. McIlhany, 798 S.W.2d 556, 558 (Tex. 1990); In re State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 100 S.W.3d 338, 340 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2002, orig. proceeding); Lopez v. Martin, 10 S.W.3d 790, 794 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 2000, pet. denied); In re Doctors' Hosp., 2 S.W.3d 504, 506 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1999, orig. proceeding); Castellanos v. Littlejohn, 945 S.W.2d 236, 241 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion to stay proceedings are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Astec Underground

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Feb 3, 2011
No. 13-11-00065-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 3, 2011)
Case details for

In re Astec Underground

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ASTEC UNDERGROUND, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Feb 3, 2011

Citations

No. 13-11-00065-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 3, 2011)