From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re A.S.M.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Oct 31, 2022
No. 12-22-00257-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 31, 2022)

Opinion

12-22-00257-CV

10-31-2022

IN THE INTEREST OF A.S.M., A CHILD


APPEAL FROM THE 307TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS (TR.CT.NO. 2001-1995-DR)

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Author J. Manning, II, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal with this Court on September 16, 2022. That same day, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the notice of appeal failed to contain the information specifically required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and Section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5 (service); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter's record). The notice warned that, unless Appellant filed a proper notice of appeal on or before October 17, the appeal would be referred to the Court for dismissal. This deadline passed and Appellant has not filed a compliant notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this Court's notice.

Pro se litigants are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with all applicable rules of procedure; otherwise, pro se litigants would benefit from an unfair advantage over parties represented by counsel. Muhammed v. Plains Pipeline, L.P., No. 12-16-00189-CV, 2017 WL 2665180, at *2 n.3 (Tex. App.- Tyler June 21, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.).

Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 9.5 and Section 51.017(a), the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (on its own initiative after giving ten days' notice to all parties, appellate court may dismiss appeal if appeal is subject to dismissal because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time).

We also note that the notice of appeal does not show this Court's jurisdiction, in that there is no final judgment or appealable order. Nor has Appellant filed the required docketing statement. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.


Summaries of

In re A.S.M.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Oct 31, 2022
No. 12-22-00257-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 31, 2022)
Case details for

In re A.S.M.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF A.S.M., A CHILD

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler

Date published: Oct 31, 2022

Citations

No. 12-22-00257-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 31, 2022)

Citing Cases

Manning v. The Attorney Gen.

See Manning v. State of Texas and In the Interest of S.M., No. 12-23-00203-CV, 2023 WL 5978202 (Tex.…

Manning v. State ex rel. S.M.

(per curiam) (mem. op.); see also Interest of A.S.M., No. 12-22-00257-CV, 2022 WL 16558446 (Tex. App.-Tyler…