From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ashton

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 19, 2008
No. 05-08-00190-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 19, 2008)

Opinion

No. 05-08-00190-CV

Opinion issued February 19, 2008.

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 07-10336.

Before Justices MORRIS, RICHTER, and MAZZANT.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relators contend the trial judge abused his discretion in ordering that relators have no ex parte contacts with non-party treating physicians of real party in interest. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown the trial judge clearly abused his discretion. . See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Ashton

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 19, 2008
No. 05-08-00190-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 19, 2008)
Case details for

In re Ashton

Case Details

Full title:IN RE SCOTT ASHTON, DPM AND ASHTON PODIATRY ASSOCIATES, P.A., Relators

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Feb 19, 2008

Citations

No. 05-08-00190-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 19, 2008)