In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation

Full title: IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. VI) This Document…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 31, 2011

CIVIL ACTION NO. MDL 875, EDPA CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-80102 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. MDL 875, EDPA CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-80102.

January 31, 2011

ORDER

DAVID STRAWBRIDGE, Magistrate Judge

AND NOW, this 31^st day of January, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant's motion to determine the sufficiency of Plaintiffs' answers to Defendant's second requests for admissions (Doc. 97), and Plaintiffs' motions for leave to file supplemental declarations of their expert reports in support of their responses to Defendant's motions in limine and for summary judgment (Docs. 106, 107.), along with their respective responses and replies, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant's "Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Answers 1-15 to Defendant's Second Request for Admissions and Deem Insufficient Answers as Admitted Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. 36(a)(6)" (Doc. 97) is DENIED, Plaintiffs' objections to Defendant's requests for admission are SUSTAINED, and Plaintiffs' answers to Defendant's requests for admission are DEEMED SUFFICIENT.

2. Plaintiffs' motions for leave to supplement the record in support of their responses to Defendant's motions in limine and for summary judgment (Docs. 106, 107) are GRANTED.