Opinion
No. 20-2331
04-30-2021
In re: KEITH A. ARRICK, SR., Petitioner.
Keith A. Arrick, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:17-cv-00131-TSK) Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith A. Arrick, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Keith A. Arrick, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for relief from the court's judgment dismissing his Bivens claim. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court, on March 31, 2021, denied Arrick's Rule 59 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Arrick's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot and deny Arrick's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).