From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Apr 18, 2011
No. 01-11-00208-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2011)

Opinion

No. 01-11-00208-CV

Opinion issued April 18, 2011.

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Panel consists of Justices JENNINGS, HIGLEY, and BROWN.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relators, Darryl Armstrong and Armstrong Medical Supply, LLC, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1. Relators challenge the trial court's March 4, 2011 order in which the trial court orders Darryl Armstrong to sit for deposition (1) pursuant to Rule of Civil Procedure 202 and (2) pursuant to its inherent power to "enforce its final judgment and accompanying injunctions entered in this action."

The respondent is The Honorable Brady Elliott, Presiding Judge of the 268th District Court of Fort Bend County. The underlying suit is Jordan Reses Supply Company, Respironics, Inc. and Resmed Corp. v. Vaughn Medical Equipment Repair Service, LLC, Marcus Thierry, Nicole Baxter-Thierry, and Joseph Company, No. 10-DCV-178015 (268th Dist. Court, Fort Bend County, Tex.).

We deny relators' petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, the stay of the taking of the deposition previously imposed in this proceeding is lifted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) ("Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.").


Summaries of

In re Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Apr 18, 2011
No. 01-11-00208-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2011)
Case details for

In re Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DARRYL ARMSTRONG AND ARMSTRONG MEDICAL SUPPLY, LLC, Relators

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Apr 18, 2011

Citations

No. 01-11-00208-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2011)