In re Armour v. Adirondack Park Agency

Full title: MATTER OF MARYLEE ARMOUR, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. ADIRONDACK PARK…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2003

2 A.D.3d 1300 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

768 N.Y.S.2d 896

Opinion

CA 03-00937.

December 31, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Kirk, J.), entered February 4, 2003, which granted the CPLR article 78 petition and ordered respondent to process petitioner's after-the-fact permit application.

ELIOT SPITZER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (LAWRENCE A. RAPPOPORT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

BRICKWEDDE LAW FIRM, SYRACUSE (RICHARD J. BRICKWEDDE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Before: PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Same Memorandum as in Adirondack Park Agency v. Bucci ( 2 A.D.3d 1293).