From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Argueta

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 12, 2015
133 A.D.3d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

520527

11-12-2015

In the Matter of the Claim of Aaron D. ARGUETA, Appellant. Barney's New York, Inc., Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

DeLince Law, PLLC, New York City (J. Patrick DeLince of counsel), for appellant. Proskauer Rose, LLP, New York City (Howard Z. Robbins of counsel), for Barney's New York, Inc., respondent. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.


DeLince Law, PLLC, New York City (J. Patrick DeLince of counsel), for appellant.

Proskauer Rose, LLP, New York City (Howard Z. Robbins of counsel), for Barney's New York, Inc., respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 18, 2014, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a store detective in the loss prevention department of a retail clothing store for taking unauthorized breaks and sleeping during his shift. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to disqualifying misconduct. Contrary to claimant's contention, the testimony at the hearing and the inferences to be drawn from the videotape evidence provide substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that claimant slept during his shift, which claimant was aware violated the employer's established policy (see Matter of Beydoun [Trump World Tower Condominium–Commissioner of Labor], 308 A.D.2d 625, 625, 764 N.Y.S.2d 226 [2003] ; Matter of De Maria [Commissioner of Labor], 276 A.D.2d 1010, 1010–1011, 714 N.Y.S.2d 588 [2000] ). Although claimant denied that he was sleeping, this presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Sanders [Rescue Mission Alliance Inc.-Commissioner of Labor], 106 A.D.3d 1311, 1312, 965 N.Y.S.2d 238 [2013] ; Matter of Jordan [Moschitto Trim & Jewelry Corp.-Commissioner of Labor], 296 A.D.2d 734, 734–735, 745 N.Y.S.2d 301 [2002] ). Claimant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be unpersuasive.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

GARRY, J.P., ROSE, DEVINE and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Argueta

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 12, 2015
133 A.D.3d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

In re Argueta

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Aaron D. ARGUETA, Appellant. Barney's New…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 12, 2015

Citations

133 A.D.3d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8224
18 N.Y.S.3d 891