From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Arbitration Between Cnty. of Monroe

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 23, 2016
145 A.D.3d 1524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

12-23-2016

In the Matter of ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF MONROE, Petitioner–Respondent, and MONROE COUNTY FEDERATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS, IUE–CWA LOCAL 381, Respondent–Appellant.

Trevett Cristo Salzer & Andolina, P.C., Rochester (Daniel P. Debolt of Counsel), for respondent-appellant. Harris Beach PLLC, Pittsford (Kyle W. Sturgess of Counsel), for petitioner-respondent.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered June 2, 2015. The order denied the motion of respondent for leave to reargue its opposition to the petition to vacate an arbitrator's award.

Trevett Cristo Salzer & Andolina, P.C., Rochester (Daniel P. Debolt of Counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Harris Beach PLLC, Pittsford (Kyle W. Sturgess of Counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

We agree with petitioner that respondent's appeal must be dismissed because no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue (see Miller v. Ludwig, 126 A.D.3d 1397, 1398, 3 N.Y.S.3d 696 ; Empire Ins. Co. v. Food City, 167 A.D.2d 983, 984, 562 N.Y.S.2d 5 ).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, and TROUTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Arbitration Between Cnty. of Monroe

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 23, 2016
145 A.D.3d 1524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Arbitration Between Cnty. of Monroe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF MONROE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 23, 2016

Citations

145 A.D.3d 1524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8673
42 N.Y.S.3d 915