From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Arata

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 12, 2012
99 So. 3d 29 (La. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2012–B–1729.

2012-10-12

In re William Harrell ARATA.


In re Disciplinary Counsel;—Other; Applying For Petition for Interim Suspension for Threat of Harm, Pursuant Rule XIX, § 19.2.

ORDER

[2012-1729 (La. 1]Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension for Threat of Harm filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the report and recommendation of the hearing committee, and the responses filed by the parties thereto,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for interim suspension be denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall fully and completely adhere to all terms of the recovery agreement he executed with the Lawyers Assistance Program, and such other conditions as may be imposed upon him by the Lawyers Assistance Program. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall monitor respondent's compliance with his recovery agreement and notify this court of any violation, which may be grounds for placing respondent on disability inactive status, or interim suspension, as appropriate.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Marcus R. Clark

/s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana


Summaries of

In re Arata

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 12, 2012
99 So. 3d 29 (La. 2012)
Case details for

In re Arata

Case Details

Full title:In re William Harrell ARATA.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Oct 12, 2012

Citations

99 So. 3d 29 (La. 2012)

Citing Cases

In re Arata

On October 12, 2012, we denied the petition for interim suspension. In re: Arata, 12–1729 (La.10/12/12), 99…