From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re A.R

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 6, 2009
121 Ohio St. 3d 1472 (Ohio 2009)

Opinion

No. 2009-0189.

May 6, 2009.

Licking App. No. 08-CA-17, 2008-Ohio-6581.


APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.

Discretionary appeal accepted. Briefing shall proceed on Proposition of Law No. I, and oral argument on Proposition of Law No. I shall be held on the same day as 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234.

Proposition of Law Nos. II and III are held for the decision in 2008-1624, In re Smith, and briefing is stayed as to those propositions of law.

PFEIFER, J., would also order briefing and oral argument on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III.

O'DONNELL and CUPP, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

In re A.R

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 6, 2009
121 Ohio St. 3d 1472 (Ohio 2009)
Case details for

In re A.R

Case Details

Full title:In re A.R

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 6, 2009

Citations

121 Ohio St. 3d 1472 (Ohio 2009)
2009 Ohio 2045

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

We find no grounds to deviate from this precedent in the present appeal. The Ohio Supreme Court has accepted…

In re F.L.S.

The Ohio Supreme Court has accepted discretionary jurisdiction in several of these cases. See In re Smith,…