In re Apps

Full title: IN RE: WILLIAM P. APPS, SUZANNE WHITFIELD CLARK, Appellants

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: May 6, 2022

No. 2021-2125 (Fed. Cir. May. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2021-2125

05-06-2022

IN RE: WILLIAM P. APPS, SUZANNE WHITFIELD CLARK, Appellants

Timothy Murphy, Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, PC, Birmingham, MI, argued for appellants William P. Apps, Suzanne Whitfield Clark. Also represented by John E. Carlson. Maureen Donovan Queler, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by Thomas W. Krause, Monica Barnes Lateef, Amy J. Nelson, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/710, 124.

Timothy Murphy, Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, PC, Birmingham, MI, argued for appellants William P. Apps, Suzanne Whitfield Clark. Also represented by John E. Carlson.

Maureen Donovan Queler, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by Thomas W. Krause, Monica Barnes Lateef, Amy J. Nelson, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

PER CURIAM

Moore, Chief Judge, Dyk and Prost, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.