From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Appotronics Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 9, 2015
618 F. App'x 678 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2015-1220

10-09-2015

IN RE: APPOTRONICS LTD., FKA YLX LTD., Appellant

YING CHEN, Chen Yoshimura LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, MOLLY R. SILFEN.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 90/011,694.

JUDGMENT

YING CHEN, Chen Yoshimura LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, MOLLY R. SILFEN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 9, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Appotronics Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 9, 2015
618 F. App'x 678 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

In re Appotronics Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: APPOTRONICS LTD., FKA YLX LTD., Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 9, 2015

Citations

618 F. App'x 678 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Sorin Grp. USA, Inc. v. St. Jude Med., S.C., Inc.

As to exhibit scanning, the Court has held this kind of cost is "allowable because the exhibits themselves…

Smith-Bunge v. Wis. Cent., Ltd.

Although Wisconsin Central did not cite to Bourgonje's deposition, it was reasonably necessary to obtain a…