From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Application of William Rudolph Lindquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Sep 3, 1976
246 N.W.2d 35 (Minn. 1976)

Summary

granting reinstatement to attorney following full presidential pardon of conviction

Summary of this case from In re Reutter

Opinion

No. 46451.

September 3, 1976.

Attorney and client — reinstatement of disbarred attorney.

Petition by William Rudolph Lindquist for reinstatement as an attorney at law of this state. Application granted.

William R. Lindquist, pro se, and W. N. Bernard, for petitioner.

Henry W. McCarr, Administrative Director, and Francis V. Harris, Assistant Director, for objector, State Board of Professional Responsibility.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


The petitioner, William Rudolph Lindquist, was disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Minnesota on January 14, 1944. In re Disbarment of William Rudolph Lindquist, 216 Minn. 344, 12 N.W.2d 719 (1944). That proceeding, which was uncontested, resulted from petitioner's conviction in the Federal court on October 5, 1943, for failing to report for induction in the armed forces of the United States. He was sentenced to Federal prison at Sandstone, Minnesota, and released on June 15, 1944. On December 23, 1947, petitioner received a full pardon from the President of the United States.

Mr. Lindquist is now 71 years of age and has not practiced law for nearly 33 years. Much of that time he has devoted to missionary work in Brazil and Mexico. Although he did not obtain status as a conscientious objector, there is evidence that his refusal to report for induction was prompted by a religious conviction against war and against the use of military force to resolve conflicts among nations and their people. Apart from his Federal conviction, Mr. Lindquist's record appears to be unblemished. There is no suggestion that during the years he was in practice he was guilty of any impropriety in his dealings with his clients, the public, or the court. Under these unique circumstances his petition for reinstatement is granted. However, because of his age and his professional inactivity, it is obvious to petitioner, as it is to us, that it is not in his interest or the public's for Mr. Lindquist now to resume active practice. Accordingly, he seeks only retired status under Rule 2(a), Rules for Registration of Attorneys, dated August 4, 1970.

Rule 2(a) is as follows: "The following attorneys and judges shall pay an annual registration fee of Twelve Dollars ($12.00): (a) Any attorney who has reached the age of 70 years and files annually with the clerk of supreme court an affidavit that he is not engaged in the practice of law."

The application of William Rudolph Lindquist for reinstatement to the bar of Minnesota as an attorney at law with retired status is granted.


Summaries of

In re Application of William Rudolph Lindquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Sep 3, 1976
246 N.W.2d 35 (Minn. 1976)

granting reinstatement to attorney following full presidential pardon of conviction

Summary of this case from In re Reutter
Case details for

In re Application of William Rudolph Lindquist

Case Details

Full title:IN RE APPLICATION OF WILLIAM RUDOLPH LINDQUIST

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Sep 3, 1976

Citations

246 N.W.2d 35 (Minn. 1976)
246 N.W.2d 35

Citing Cases

Petition of Hanson

On two occasions, this court has allowed reinstatement of attorneys over 70 years of age, which the Director…

Peterson v. Sheran

He had not actively practiced law, and petitioned for reinstatement on retired status, which means he would…