From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Application of Seligson v. Kerik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 25, 2002
295 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1473

June 25, 2002.

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated November 25, 2000, finding petitioner guilty of specified misconduct and imposing a forfeiture of 30 vacation days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Joan Madden, J.], entered on or about June 21, 2001) dismissed, without costs.

HOWARD B. STERINBACH, for petitioner.

SHARYN ROOTENBERG, for respondents.

Tom, J.P., Buckley, Ellerin, Rubin, Gonzalez, JJ.


Substantial evidence, including the testimony of the complainant and another witness to the incident, supports the Commissioner's finding that petitioner used excessive force against a civilian and abused his authority by threatening to arrest that civilian without justification (see, Matter of Hickey v. Ward, 161 A.D.2d 495) . The credibility determinations of the administrative law judge supporting the findings of guilt against petitioner are essentially unreviewable (see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443-444). In light of the proven misconduct, the penalty imposed is certainly not shockingly severe (see,Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 39-40).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Application of Seligson v. Kerik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 25, 2002
295 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In re Application of Seligson v. Kerik

Case Details

Full title:IN RE APPLICATION OF POLICE OFFICER WILLIAM SELIGSON, ETC., PETITIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 25, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 665

Citing Cases

In re Application of Jones v. Kerik

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Rosenberger, Lerner, JJ. Substantial evidence, including the testimony of…

In re Appl. of Wagner v. Kerik

Before: Williams, P.J., Rosenberger, Rubin, Friedman, Gonzalez, JJ. Substantial evidence, including the…