From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Application of Murphy v. Kerik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 6, 2003
303 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

407

March 6, 2003.

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated April 2, 2001, finding that petitioner abused his authority as a police officer by arresting the complainant without probable cause and used excessive force against the complainant, and imposing a 15-day suspension without pay, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Walter Tolub, J.], entered April 10, 2002), dismissed, without costs.

Howard B. Sterinbach, for petitioner.

Drake A. Colley, for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Williams, Friedman, JJ.


Respondent's findings are supported by substantial evidence, namely, the recorded statements of the complainant and four eyewitnesses made in interviews with the Civilian Complaint Review Board (see Matter of Saunders v. City of New York, 273 A.D.2d 103, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 766). No basis exists to disturb respondent's findings of credibility (see id.). The penalty does not shock our sense of fairness (see Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 39-40).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Application of Murphy v. Kerik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 6, 2003
303 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re Application of Murphy v. Kerik

Case Details

Full title:IN RE APPLICATION OF JAMY MURPHY, ETC., Petitioner, FOR A JUDGMENT, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 6, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 244