From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Application of Lamb

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 11, 1961
170 A.2d 34 (N.J. 1961)

Opinion

Argued April 10, 1961 —

Decided April 11, 1961.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 67 N.J. Super. 39.

Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier argued the cause for the appellants ( Mr. Seymour Margulies, on the brief).

Mr. Theodore I. Botter, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, attorney).


A petition was filed in the Appellate Division alleging that Chapter 1, Laws of 1961, was void on the ground that it was not adopted in the manner required by the Constitution. The Appellate Division sustained the act. The applicants prosecuted the present appeal.

For the reasons given by the Appellate Division we are satisfied the Governor was empowered by Art. V, sec. 1, par. 12 of the Constitution to convene the General Assembly to consider the subject of reapportionment and that his call was sufficient to that end. The challenge to the validity of the bill adopted by the General Assembly in response to the Governor's call is accordingly without merit. The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

In re Application of Lamb

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 11, 1961
170 A.2d 34 (N.J. 1961)
Case details for

In re Application of Lamb

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JOSEPH LAMB, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 11, 1961

Citations

170 A.2d 34 (N.J. 1961)
170 A.2d 34

Citing Cases

In re Application of McCabe

However, it has been uniformly held that the subject matter of the inquiry involves only the mechanics of the…

Gilbert v. Gladden

In the absence of constitutional or statutory standards, it is not the function of this Court to substitute…