From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Apple & AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
Case No. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW

10-20-2011

In re Apple and AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litigation ALL CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS

MICHAEL W. SOBOL ROGER N. HELLER ALLISON ELGART LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP By: MICHAEL W. SOBOL Attorneys for Plaintiffs PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS ANDREW D. MUHLBACH STUART C. PLUNKETT MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.


PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607)

(PPreovolos@mofo.com)

ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694)

(AMuhlbach@mofo.com)

STUART C. PLUNKETT (CA SBN 187971)

(SPlunkett@mofo.com)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.

CLASS ACTION


STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING APPLE'S

TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED MASTER

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT


The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte


[N.D. Cal. Civil L.R.6-1]

Plaintiffs Adam Weisblatt, Joe Hanna, David Turk and Colette Osetek ("plaintiffs") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on August 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Master Consolidated Complaint ("FAMCC") in the above-captioned case;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, Apple's response to the FAMCC would be due October 21, 2011 (Dkt. No. 116);

WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple are in the process of mediating this dispute with the Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) and Catherine A. Yanni, Esq. of JAMS;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple have made substantial progress toward a possible resolution;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple agree to extend Apple's time to respond to the FAMCC to permit additional time for mediation discussions;

WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by the Court;

THEREFORE, plaintiffs and Apple stipulate that Apple's time to respond is extended by 30 days, until November 21, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

MICHAEL W. SOBOL

ROGER N. HELLER

ALLISON ELGART

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &

BERNSTEIN, LLP

By: MICHAEL W. SOBOL

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS

ANDREW D. MUHLBACH

STUART C. PLUNKETT

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.

I, Penelope A. Preovolos, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that I have on file the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document.

By: Penelope A. Preovolos

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge


Summaries of

In re Apple & AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
Case No. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

In re Apple & AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re Apple and AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litigation ALL CONSOLIDATED…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

Case No. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)