From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Apple & AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
Case No. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW

03-18-2013

In re Apple and AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litigation ALL CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS

MICHAEL W. SOBOL ROGER N. HELLER ALLISON ELGART LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP MICHAEL W. SOBOL Attorneys for Plaintiffs PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS ANDREW D. MUHLBACH STUART C. PLUNKETT MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.


PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607)
(PPreovolos@mofo.com)
ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694)
(AMuhlbach@mofo.com)
STUART C. PLUNKETT (CA SBN 187971)
(SPlunkett@mofo.com)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

CLASS ACTION


STIPULATION AND []

ORDER EXTENDING APPLE'S

TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST

AMENDED MASTER

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT


The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte


[N.D. Cal. Civil L.R.6-1]

Plaintiffs Adam Weisblatt, Joe Hanna, David Turk and Colette Osetek ("plaintiffs") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on August 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Master Consolidated Complaint ("FAMCC") in the above-captioned case;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, Apple's response to the FAMCC would be due February 28, 2013;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple are engaged in productive settlement discussions and have made substantial progress towards resolving this matter;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple agree to extend Apple's time to respond to the FAMCC to permit additional time for settlement discussions;

WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by the Court;

THEREFORE, plaintiffs and Apple stipulate that Apple's time to respond is extended until April 1, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

MICHAEL W. SOBOL

ROGER N. HELLER

ALLISON ELGART

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &

BERNSTEIN, LLP

By: __________________

MICHAEL W. SOBOL

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS

ANDREW D. MUHLBACH

STUART C. PLUNKETT

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: ____________________

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.

I, Penelope A. Preovolos, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation. I hereby attest that I have on file the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document.

By: ___________________

Penelope A. Preovolos

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge


Summaries of

In re Apple & AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
Case No. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

In re Apple & AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re Apple and AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litigation ALL CONSOLIDATED…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

Case No. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)