Opinion
No. 15-3518
07-11-2017
FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS: ERIK S. JAFFE, Washington, DC. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY: BERNARD J. GARBUTT III, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON: Nafiz Cekirge, Bryan Cave LLP, Santa Monica, CA. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE U.S. BANK, N.A.: Eric R. Sherman, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN, Christopher Karagheuzoff, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, New York, NY. FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES CITIBANK, N.A., AND HSBC BANK USA, N.A.: Christopher J. Houpt, Michelle Joy Annunziata, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.: Lisa J. Fried, Robin Muir, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY.
SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 11th day of July, two thousand seventeen. PRESENT: ROBERT D. SACK, SUSAN L. CARNEY, CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, Circuit Judges. FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS: ERIK S. JAFFE, Washington, DC. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY: BERNARD J. GARBUTT III, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON: Nafiz Cekirge, Bryan Cave LLP, Santa Monica, CA. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE U.S. BANK, N.A.: Eric R. Sherman, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN, Christopher Karagheuzoff, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, New York, NY. FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES CITIBANK, N.A., AND HSBC BANK USA, N.A.: Christopher J. Houpt, Michelle Joy Annunziata, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.: Lisa J. Fried, Robin Muir, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY.
Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Woods, J.).
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court entered October 19, 2015, is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiffs-appellants are individuals who own or previously owned homes subject to foreclosure proceedings. Their complaint alleges that the defendants-appellees, who are trustees of mortgage loan trusts, violated the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO") Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68, by asserting ownership of the plaintiffs' mortgages despite knowing that those mortgages had been transferred into the trusts outside the timeframe mandated by the trusts' Pooling and Servicing Agreements ("PSAs"), rendering the transfers void. The District Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs lacked both Article iii standing and prudential standing to bring the suit. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case, to which we refer only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm.
We conclude that the District Court properly dismissed the complaint, and we affirm the judgment for substantially the reasons stated by the District Court in its October 19, 2015 opinion. As appellants concede, our Court has previously addressed squarely and rejected appellants' arguments under circumstances not materially different from those presented here. See Rajamin v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 757 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2014). We decline appellants' request that we revisit Rajamin's holdings (which this panel in any event is not empowered to do) or certify to the New York Court of Appeals questions addressed by Rajamin.
* * *
We have considered all of appellants' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the October 19, 2015 judgment of the District Court.
FOR THE COURT:
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court