From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Anthony Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 20, 2010
73 A.D.3d 1369 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 507972.

May 20, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Anthony Johnson, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr., Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, was served with a misbehavior report charging him with using a controlled substance after his urine sample twice tested positive for cannabinoids. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty and that determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, along with the positive test results, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt ( see Matter of White v Superintendent of Wyoming Correctional Facility, 69 AD3d 1180, 1181; Matter of Duffy v Fischer, 69 AD3d 1073, 1074). Furthermore, contrary to petitioner's contention, all of the necessary documentation required to support the admission of the positive test results into evidence was contained in the hearing record ( see 7 NYCRR 1020.5 [a] [1]; Matter of Smart v Fischer, 67 AD3d 1222, 1222, lv denied 14 NY3d 705; Matter of Karapetian v Fischer, 65 AD3d 772).

Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and are without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Anthony Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 20, 2010
73 A.D.3d 1369 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Anthony Johnson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 20, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 1369 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4310
900 N.Y.S.2d 695

Citing Cases

Paddyfote v. Fischer

Moreover, the record discloses that petitioner was provided with all of the required testing documentation (…

Merritt v. Fischer

Accordingly, “because a loss of good time was imposed as part of the penalty and [one] charge must now be…