Opinion
01-28-2016
Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Dona B. Morris of counsel), for respondent. Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (John A. Newbery of counsel), attorney for the children.
Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Dona B. Morris of counsel), for respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (John A. Newbery of counsel), attorney for the children.
TOM, J.P., SWEENY, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ.
Order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper), Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about January 6, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, determined that appellant, who was a person legally responsible for the care of two of the subject children and was the father of the third, neglected them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly found that petitioner satisfied its burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that appellant neglected the subject children based on his admissions that he punched one of the children in the face to extract a loose tooth and was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder and depression, and the testimony of the caseworker concerning statements by the older children that he choked the mother in front of them, threatened to kill the mother, the children, and the caseworker, and choked one of the children (see Nicholson v. Scoppetta, 3 N.Y.3d 357, 368–369, 787 N.Y.S.2d 196, 820 N.E.2d 840 [2004] ).
The children's out-of-court statements were admissible because they were cross corroborated and supported by appellant's admissions and the bruises on the mother and two of the children that were observed by different police officers (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 118, 524 N.Y.S.2d 19, 518 N.E.2d 914 [1987] ; Matter of Jadaquis B. [Sameerah B.], 116 A.D.3d 448, 449, 984 N.Y.S.2d 309 [1st Dept.2014] ).
The evidence presented as to appellant's conduct with respect to the mother and the older children was sufficient to support a finding of neglect as to the youngest child (see Matter of Nhyashanti A. [Evelyn B.], 102 A.D.3d 470, 956 N.Y.S.2d 887 [1st Dept.2013] ).