Opinion
6484
05-08-2018
Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Carolyn Walther of counsel), for respondent. Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (John A. Newbery of counsel), attorney for the child.
Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Carolyn Walther of counsel), for respondent.
Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (John A. Newbery of counsel), attorney for the child.
Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sarah P. Cooper, J.), entered on or about September 7, 2017, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about September 6, 2017, which found that respondent father neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from fact-finding order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition.
The finding that the father neglected the subject child is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. The record shows that the father inflicted excessive corporal punishment on the child by striking her with the handle of a sword on the back of her head while chasing her down a flight of stairs, causing her to sustain, among other things, cuts and lacerations on and around her ear, a concussion, and swelling to her right finger. The child's out-of-court statements were sufficiently corroborated by the agency caseworker and hospital staff's observations of the child's injuries, photographs depicting the injuries, and medical records (see Matter of Tyson T. [Latoyer T.] , 146 A.D.3d 669, 45 N.Y.S.3d 459 [1st Dept. 2017] ; Matter of Harrhae Y. [Shy–Macca Ernestine B.], 112 A.D.3d 512, 977 N.Y.S.2d 22 [1st Dept. 2013] ). Although the child's repetition of the same allegations that the father hit her in the back of the head with the sword handle did not provide corroboration for the out-of-court statements, the consistency of her reported statements enhanced her credibility (see Matter of David R. [Carmen R.] , 123 A.D.3d 483, 484, 998 N.Y.S.2d 182 [1st Dept. 2014] ).
There exists no basis to disturb the court's credibility determinations (see Matter of Irene O., 38 N.Y.2d 776, 777, 381 N.Y.S.2d 865, 345 N.E.2d 337 [1975] ).