From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 30, 2009
No. 05-09-01143-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 30, 2009)

Opinion

No. 05-09-01143-CV

Opinion issued September 30, 2009.

Original Proceeding from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F97-53114.

Before Justices WRIGHT, O'NEILL, and MURPHY.

Opinion by Justice O'NEILL.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not entering a judgment nunc pro tunc. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); State of Texas ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 67 S.W.3d 177, 180-81 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 30, 2009
No. 05-09-01143-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 30, 2009)
Case details for

In re Anderson

Case Details

Full title:IN RE STEVE S. ANDERSON, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Sep 30, 2009

Citations

No. 05-09-01143-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 30, 2009)