From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 28, 2010
77 A.D.3d 1277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. (Attorney Registration No. 2402089).

October 28, 2010.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael G. Gaynor of counsel), for petitioner.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Kavanagh, Stein and McCarthy, JJ.


Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1991 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Schenectady County.

Respondent has failed to comply with a subpoena duces tecum dated July 15, 2010, pursuant to which petitioner directed respondent to appear at a continued examination under oath on September 9, 2010, and to produce records relevant to its investigation of several pending complaints against him. Respondent has further failed to reply to petitioner's instant motion to suspend him from the practice of law pending his full compliance with the subpoena ( see 22 NYCRR 806.4 [b]). Under the circumstances, we grant petitioner's motion and suspend respondent from the practice of law, effective 20 days from the date of this decision, pending his full compliance with the subpoena and until further order of this Court ( see e.g. Matter of McCormick, 75 AD3d 1049; Matter of Ashe, 300 AD2d 737).

Ordered that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is suspended from the practice of law, effective 20 days from the date of this decision, pending his full compliance with the subpoena duces tecum dated July 15, 2010, and until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorney ( see 22 NYCRR 806.9).


Summaries of

In re Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 28, 2010
77 A.D.3d 1277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Anderson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of AARON R. ANDERSON, an Attorney, Respondent. COMMITTEE ON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2010

Citations

77 A.D.3d 1277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7664
909 N.Y.S.2d 406

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Aaron R. Anderson

His last known address is in Saratoga County. By decision dated October 28, 2010, this Court suspended…

In re Sang Kyu Hwang

He maintains a business address in Seoul, South Korea. Respondent has failed to comply with a subpoena duces…