From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Anderson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Dec 9, 1999
741 A.2d 37 (D.C. 1999)

Summary

considering "learning in the law" for readmission

Summary of this case from In re Turner

Opinion

No. 99-BG-735.

Submitted October 28, 1999.

Decided December 9, 1999.

On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility.

Before STEADMAN and SCHWELB, Associate Judges, and FERREN, Senior Judge.


In 1982, Floyd W. Anderson pleaded guilty to three misdemeanor counts of false pretenses. This court disbarred Anderson after finding that these were crimes involving moral turpitude. In re Anderson, 474 A.2d 145, 146 (D.C. 1994). Anderson now seeks reinstatement to the Bar of the District of Columbia. The Hearing Committee applied the relevant factors, In re Roundtree, 503 A.2d 1215, 1217 (D.C. 1985), and recommended reinstatement. The Board on Professional Responsibility adopted that recommendation. "Although the ultimate decision on whether an attorney is reinstated is ours alone, the Board's findings or recommendations in this regard are entitled to great weight." In re Borders, 665 A.2d 1381, 1381-82 (D.C. 1995) (internal citations and quotations omitted). Although Bar Counsel argued against the petition before the Hearing Committee, he did not file any exceptions to the Board's recommendation with us and thus the recommendation for reinstatement comes to us as unopposed, thus entitling the Board's decision to even greater deference. See In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285, 1288 (D.C. 1995); see also, D.C. Bar R. XI § 16 (e) (where petition for reinstatement is unopposed, the court may grant it without further briefing or argument).

Giving great weight to the Board's findings and recommendation, we conclude that Anderson has shown, by clear and convincing evidence, (1) that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in the law required for re-admission; and (2) that his resumption of the practice of law will not be detrimental to the integrity and standing of the Bar, or to the administration of justice, or subversive to the public interest. D.C. Bar R. XI § 16 (d). Accordingly, and substantially for the reasons stated by the Board, Floyd W. Anderson is reinstated to the practice of law in this jurisdiction effective immediately.

So ordered.


Summaries of

In re Anderson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Dec 9, 1999
741 A.2d 37 (D.C. 1999)

considering "learning in the law" for readmission

Summary of this case from In re Turner

considering "learning in the law required for re-admission"

Summary of this case from In re Reynolds
Case details for

In re Anderson

Case Details

Full title:In re Floyd W. Anderson, Petitioner

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 9, 1999

Citations

741 A.2d 37 (D.C. 1999)

Citing Cases

In re Turner

A lawyer seeking reinstatement after a period of suspension or disbarment should be prepared to demonstrate…

In re Reynolds

A lawyer seeking reinstatement after a period of suspension or disbarment should be prepared to demonstrate…