From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anak Wine & Liquor Co. v. New York Liqour Authority

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 27, 1968
243 N.E.2d 757 (N.Y. 1968)

Opinion

Argued November 13, 1968

Decided November 27, 1968

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, BENJAMIN BRENNER, J.

Robert W. Corcoran for appellant.

Hyman Amsel and Joseph S. Ryan for State Liquor Authority and another, respondents.

David J. Eisenberg for Murray Wine Liquor, Inc., respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, BERGAN, BREITEL and JASEN. Judges SCILEPPI and KEATING dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the order and judgment of Special Term upon the ground that the finding of the State Liquor Authority that the public convenience and advantage will be served by the granting of another retail liquor store license in this dilapidated, poverty stricken, disease and crime-ridden neighborhood is without support in the record.


Summaries of

Anak Wine & Liquor Co. v. New York Liqour Authority

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 27, 1968
243 N.E.2d 757 (N.Y. 1968)
Case details for

Anak Wine & Liquor Co. v. New York Liqour Authority

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANAK WINE LIQUOR CO., INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 27, 1968

Citations

243 N.E.2d 757 (N.Y. 1968)
243 N.E.2d 757
296 N.Y.S.2d 154