From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Amundson

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Oct 17, 2014
869 N.W.2d 671 (Minn. 2014)

Summary

imposing a public reprimand for an attorney’s knowingly false statements to a court and opposing counsel

Summary of this case from In re Sklar

Opinion

No. A14–1461.

2014-10-17

In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Lisa Marie AMUNDSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 18035X.


ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Lisa Marie Amundson committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, making knowingly false statements to a court and opposing counsel, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.3(a)(1), 4.1, and 8.4(c) and (d). In a stipulation for discipline, respondent unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition, waives her procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and with the Director recommends that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand. Along with the stipulation for discipline, the Director included a memorandum indicating that a public reprimand is the appropriate discipline in light of evidence of mitigating factors present in this case.

[W]e have suspended attorneys for misrepresentations made to our judicial officers. In re Jensen, 542 N.W.2d 627, 634 (Minn.1996). We have suspended attorneys when the attorney's misconduct involved a single misrepresentation to a court. See, e.g., In re Michael, 836 N.W.2d 753, 758–59, 767 (Minn.2013) (30–day suspension for making a false statement to a court, disobeying a court order, making a frivolous argument, and improperly accusing a judge of bias); In re Warpeha, 802 N.W.2d 361, 361 (Minn.2011) (order) (60–day suspension for making a false statement about the attorney's criminal history during voir dire when he was a potential juror); In re Van Liew, 712 N.W.2d 758, 758 (Minn.2006) (order) (90–day suspension for making a false statement to a tribunal and failing to file opposition to a motion); In re Scott, 657 N.W.2d 567, 568 (Minn.2003) (order) (30–day suspension for making false statements to a court in attorney's divorce and custody proceeding).

The court has independently reviewed the file and, in light of the evidence of mitigating factors, approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent Lisa Marie Amundson is publicly reprimanded; and

2. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/____________________

Alan C. Page

Associate Justice


Summaries of

In re Amundson

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Oct 17, 2014
869 N.W.2d 671 (Minn. 2014)

imposing a public reprimand for an attorney’s knowingly false statements to a court and opposing counsel

Summary of this case from In re Sklar
Case details for

In re Amundson

Case Details

Full title:In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Lisa Marie AMUNDSON, a…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Date published: Oct 17, 2014

Citations

869 N.W.2d 671 (Minn. 2014)

Citing Cases

In re Gallatin

But we have imposed a public reprimand in cases involving false statements to a court when there was…

In re Sklar

As Sklar claims, sometimes we impose a public reprimand for misconduct that is similar to or more severe than…