From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IN RE AMER. EXPRESS ANTI-STEERING RULES ANTITRUST LIT

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 16, 2010
06 Civ. 2974 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2010)

Opinion

06 Civ. 2974 (WHP).

July 16, 2010

Gary B. Friedman, Esq., Friedman Law Group, New York, NY, Christopher Hellmich, Esq., Patton Boggs LLP, Washington, DC, Counsel for Plaintiffs.

Donald L. Flexner, Esq., Philip C. Korologos, Esq., Boies, Schiller Flexner, LLP, New York, NY, Counsel for Defendants.


ORDER


By Memorandum and Order dated July 7, 2010, this Court stayed discovery in this action pending a decision by the Court of Appeals in American Express Co., et al. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, No. 06-1871-cv on remand from the Supreme Court, with the caveat that Plaintiffs could participate in ongoing merits-based discovery "as it unfolds in the Individual Merchant Action." (Docket No. 77 (the "July 7 Order").) By separate letters dated July 15, 2010, the parties now spar over the deposition of Colm Lorrigan, General Counsel for the Amex unit responsible for the Asia-Pacific region. Following the July 7 Order, Plaintiffs in the Individual Merchant Action pending in the Eastern District of New York postponed Lorrigan's deposition, which had been scheduled to commence July 19, 2010. Plaintiffs ask this Court to order Lorrigan to appear for a deposition "on a date certain in the near term."

The July 7 Order only permitted Plaintiffs to participate in discovery "proceeding in the Individual Merchant Action independent of this action." (July 7 Order at 6). It did not grant Plaintiffs leave to pursue merits-based discovery independent of the Individual Merchant Action. Counsel in the Individual Merchant Action has decided not to depose Lorrigan at this time. Accordingly, this Court will not interfere in ongoing discovery in the Individual Merchant Action by ordering Lorrigan's deposition at a time when counsel in the Individual Merchant Action do not want it.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

IN RE AMER. EXPRESS ANTI-STEERING RULES ANTITRUST LIT

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 16, 2010
06 Civ. 2974 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2010)
Case details for

IN RE AMER. EXPRESS ANTI-STEERING RULES ANTITRUST LIT

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: AMERICAN EXPRESS ANTI-STEERING RULES ANTITRUST LITIGATION This…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 16, 2010

Citations

06 Civ. 2974 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2010)

Citing Cases

Marcus Corp. v. Am. Express Co. (In re Am. Express Anti-Steering Rules Antitrust Litig.)

On April 18, 2006, Performance Labs, Inc.; Joseph Lepkowski, DDS d/b/a Oak Park Dental Studio; Rookies, Inc.;…