From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Am. Cal. Unemployment Benefits Litig.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jun 25, 2024
3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB (S.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2024)

Opinion

3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB

06-25-2024

IN RE BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATION This Document Relates to All Actions


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge

ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to File Under Seal portions of Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Objections to and Motion to Reverse in Part Magistrate Judge's April 24, 2024 Discovery Order that reference material designated by Defendant Bank of America as “Confidential” pursuant to the Protective Order, and no opposition having been filed, the motion is DENIED for failure to establish good cause. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file an unredacted copy of their reply brief on the public docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Am. Cal. Unemployment Benefits Litig.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jun 25, 2024
3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB (S.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2024)
Case details for

In re Am. Cal. Unemployment Benefits Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATION This…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Jun 25, 2024

Citations

3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB (S.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2024)