From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re A.M.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Clinton County
Sep 2, 2008
2008 Ohio 4435 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. CA2008-04-011.

Dated: September 2, 2008.

APPEAL FROM CLINTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION, Case No. 20053038.

William E. Peelle, Clinton County Prosecuting Attorney, William C. Randolph, for appellee, Clinton County Children Services.

Rose Dobyns Co., LPA, Blaise Underwood, for appellant, Stacy A.

Sharon A. Kornman, for guardian ad litem, Jonda C. Hamilton.

Buckley, Miller Wright, Lauren Raizk, for father, Arthur M.


DECISION


{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived.

{¶ 2} Counsel for appellant has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

WALSH, P.J., BRESSLER and POWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re A.M.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Clinton County
Sep 2, 2008
2008 Ohio 4435 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

In re A.M.

Case Details

Full title:In The Matter of: A.M., et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Clinton County

Date published: Sep 2, 2008

Citations

2008 Ohio 4435 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)