From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Interest of A.M.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 13, 2016
No. 05-16-00437-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 13, 2016)

Opinion

No. 05-16-00437-CV

06-13-2016

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M. AND E.M., CHILDREN


On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 07-1232-397

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart
Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

In a letter dated May 12, 2016, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal. Specifically, it appeared that appellant sought to appeal the trial court's January 11, 2016 Order on Enforcement for Possession which adjudged appellant in contempt of court. We instructed appellant to file a letter brief addressing our jurisdictional concern and gave appellee an opportunity to respond. In a letter dated May 23, 2016, appellant conceded that the Court does not have jurisdiction over this appeal and that mandamus relief is the appropriate remedy. Appellees have not responded to date.

Courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to review contempt orders on direct appeal. Tracy v. Tracy, 219 S.W.3d 527, 530 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, no pet.). A party pursuing review of a contempt order involving confinement may file a petition for writ of habeas corpus; a party seeking review of a contempt order that does not involve confinement may file a petition for writ of mandamus. Id.

Because appellant challenges only the trial court's contempt order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE 160437F.P05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 07-1232-397.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellees Jerry Byron and Dian Byron recover their costs of this appeal from appellant David Eugene Martin. Judgment entered June 13, 2016.


Summaries of

In re Interest of A.M.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 13, 2016
No. 05-16-00437-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 13, 2016)
Case details for

In re Interest of A.M.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF A.M. AND E.M., CHILDREN

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jun 13, 2016

Citations

No. 05-16-00437-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 13, 2016)

Citing Cases

In re Martin

Father appealed the order of enforcement, and this Court dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. SeeIn…

Barnes v. Barnes (In re Barnes)

Contempt orders are therefore reviewed by petition for writ of mandamus or petition for writ of habeas…