From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Allied Chem. Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Mar 31, 2009
No. 13-09-00160-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 31, 2009)

Opinion

No. 13-09-00160-CV

Opinion delivered and filed March 31, 2009.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices GARZA and BENAVIDES Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions), 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.")


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relators, Allied Chemical Corporation, et al., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which they contend that respondent, the Honorable Mario E. Ramirez Jr., presiding judge of the 332nd Judicial District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, abused his discretion, leaving relators without an adequate appellate remedy, by rendering an "Order Compel[l]ing Plaintiffs and Intervenors to A[nsw]er Able Supply and Borg-Warner Interrogatories" in the underlying case on March 13, 2009.

This Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and the petition should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Allied Chem. Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Mar 31, 2009
No. 13-09-00160-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 31, 2009)
Case details for

In re Allied Chem. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION, ET AL

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

No. 13-09-00160-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 31, 2009)