From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Allan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 2, 2006
34 A.D.3d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2269520.

November 2, 2006.

Per Curiam. Respondent was disbarred by this Court in 1995 based upon his conviction of a felony ( Matter of Wong, 212 AD2d 863). He now applies for reinstatement.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.


Upon the recommendation of petitioner, we referred the application to a subcommittee of this Court's Committee on Character and Fitness to interview respondent and report to the Court ( see 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]). The subcommittee recommends denial of the application.

For the reasons set forth in the subcommittee's report, we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law in this state ( see 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]). We therefore deny the application.

Ordered that respondent's application for reinstatement is denied.


Summaries of

In re Allan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 2, 2006
34 A.D.3d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In re Allan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALLAN Y. WONG, a Disbarred Attorney, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 2, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7959
822 N.Y.S.2d 739

Citing Cases

In re Oswald

By report dated December 2, 2015, a subcommittee of the Committee on Character and Fitness, to whom…

In re Oswald

By report dated December 2, 2015, a subcommittee of the Committee on Character and Fitness, to whom…