From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Actos (Pioglitazone-Prods. Liab. Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jul 26, 2016
MDL No. 6:11-md-2299 (W.D. La. Jul. 26, 2016)

Opinion

MDL No. 6:11-md-2299

07-26-2016

IN RE ACTOS (PIOGLITAZONE-PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Applies to: All Cases


JUDGE DOHERTY RECOMMENDATION ON REQUEST FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS

This Court having reviewed the Request for Distribution of Funds for services rendered by Arsement, Redd & Morella, LLC for the period April, May, and June 2016 submitted by Gary J. Russo, Special Master on July 11, 2016, and any and all objections received, I recommend to the Court that the Request be:

v Paid

___ Paid, with modifications, for the reasons found in the Memorandum Ruling filed of even date herewith.

___ Denied, for the reasons found in the Memorandum Ruling filed of even date herewith.

IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE "CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: JOINT EXPENSES (REC. DOC. 1906), ANY PARTY OBJECTING TO THIS RECOMMENDATION SHALL SUBMIT OBJECTIONS, IN WRITING, DIRECTLY TO JUDGE DOHERTY'S CHAMBERS - AND SHALL NOT FILE THE OBJECTION INTO THE RECORD - NO LATER THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS AFTER THIS RECOMMENDATION IS ENTERED.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Lafayette, Louisiana, this 26th day of July, 2016.

/s/_________

HONORABLE PATRICK J. HANNA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Actos (Pioglitazone-Prods. Liab. Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jul 26, 2016
MDL No. 6:11-md-2299 (W.D. La. Jul. 26, 2016)
Case details for

In re Actos (Pioglitazone-Prods. Liab. Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ACTOS (PIOGLITAZONE-PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jul 26, 2016

Citations

MDL No. 6:11-md-2299 (W.D. La. Jul. 26, 2016)