Opinion
No. 1588 Docket No. D5892/22 Case No. 2023-02758
02-06-2024
Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Polixene Petrakopoulos of counsel), for appellant. Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Hannah J. Sarokin of counsel), for respondent.
Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Polixene Petrakopoulos of counsel), for appellant.
Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Hannah J. Sarokin of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Singh, J.P., Moulton, Gesmer, Mendez, Rodriguez, JJ.
Order, Family Court, New York County (Jonathan H. Shim, J.), entered on or about December 1, 2022, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a firearm, and placed him on probation for a period of 24 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion when it adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him on enhanced supervision probation, which was recommended by the Probation Department, and which was the least restrictive available alternative consistent with his best interests and the need for protection of the community (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 N.Y.2d 947, 948 [1984]). An adjournment in contemplation of dismissal would not have provided sufficient supervision, in view of the seriousness of the underlying offense, which involved the possession and discharge of a firearm (on a weekday, during rush hour and near a school), appellant's failure to accept responsibility and false statements to Probation minimizing his conduct, his pattern of truancy and poor academic performance (see Matter of Pedro H., 145 A.D.3d 563, 563-564 [1st Dept 2016]).