From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Alfano

DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
May 27, 2015
Docket No. DRB 15-079 (N.J. May. 27, 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. DRB 15-079

05-27-2015

Re: In the Matter of Annette P. Alfano

ELLEN A. BRODSKY CHIEF COUNSEL MELISSA URBAN FIRST ASSISTANT COUNSEL TIMOTHY M. ELLIS LILLIAN LEWIN BARRY R. PETERSEN JR. COLIN T. TAMS KATHRYN ANNE WINTERLE ASSISTANT COUNSEL


BONNIE C. FROST, ESQ., CHAIR
EDNA Y. BAUGH, ESQ., VICE-CHAIR
BRUCE W. CLARK, ESQ.
HON MAURICE J. GALLIPOLI
THOMAS J. HOBERMAN
EILEEN RIVERA
ANNE C. SINGER, ESQ.
ROBERT C. ZMIRICH ELLEN A. BRODSKY
CHIEF COUNSEL MELISSA URBAN
FIRST ASSISTANT COUNSEL TIMOTHY M. ELLIS
LILLIAN LEWIN
BARRY R. PETERSEN JR.
COLIN T. TAMS
KATHRYN ANNE WINTERLE
ASSISTANT COUNSEL

RICHARD J. HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL , R.R.R. & REGULAR MAIL
Annette P. Alfano, Esq.
1030 Route 202 South
Branchburg, New Jersey 08876 District Docket No. XIV-2013-0210E
LETTER OF ADMONITION Dear Ms. Alfano:

The Disciplinary Review Board has reviewed the motion for discipline by consent (admonition) filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics in the above-captioned matter, pursuant to R. 1:20-10. Following a review of the record, the Board determined to grant the motion and to impose an admonition.

Specifically, on June 23 and August 30, 2010, you improperly released escrow funds that had been entrusted to you by third parties in connection with a cancelled real estate transaction. You disbursed these funds based on your former client's instructions alone and should not have done so without the express authorization of the parties who had escrowed the funds. Your conduct was unethical and in violation of RPC 1.15(a).

In imposing only an admonition, the Board took into account that your misconduct was not motivated by personal gain, that you had placed a great deal of trust in your former client, and that your disciplinary history was previously unblemished.

Your conduct has adversely reflected not only upon you as an attorney but also upon all members of the bar. Accordingly, the Board has directed the issuance of this admonition to you. R. 1:20-15(f)(4).

A permanent record of this occurrence has been filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and the Board's office. Should you become the subject of any further discipline, it will be taken into consideration.

The Board has also directed that the costs of the disciplinary proceedings be assessed against you. An invoice of costs will be forwarded under separate cover.

Very truly yours,

/s/

Ellen A. Brodsky

Chief Counsel c: Chief Justice Stuart Rabner

Associate Justices

Bonnie C. Frost, Chair (via email)

Disciplinary Review Board

Mark Neary, Clerk

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Gail G. Haney, Deputy Clerk

Supreme Court of New Jersey (w/ethics history)

Charles Centinaro, Director (via email)

Office of Attorney Ethics

Carlos Gomes, Grievant


Summaries of

In re Alfano

DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
May 27, 2015
Docket No. DRB 15-079 (N.J. May. 27, 2015)
Case details for

In re Alfano

Case Details

Full title:Re: In the Matter of Annette P. Alfano

Court:DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: May 27, 2015

Citations

Docket No. DRB 15-079 (N.J. May. 27, 2015)

Citing Cases

In re Schlissel

See, e.g., In the Matter of Annette P. Alfano, DRB 15-079 (May 27, 2015) (admonition for attorney who…

In re Casci

See, e.g., In the Matter of Annette P. Alfano, DRB 15-079 (May 27, 2015) (admonition where, after the…