From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Alexander v

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 24, 1991
598 A.2d 367 (Conn. 1991)

Opinion

Decided October 24, 1991


The respondent mother's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 741, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Under what circumstances does the due process clause of the United States constitution require a determination of parental competency as a prerequisite to a proceeding for the termination of parental rights? Were there sufficient indicia of incompetence in this case to have required the trial court to inquire into competency, sua sponte?

"2. Was the failure of trial counsel to raise the issue of competency at trial a denial of effective legal representation that prejudiced the outcome of the termination proceedings?"

Diane Polan, in support of the petition.

Susan T. Pearlman and Nina F. Elgo, assistant attorneys general, in opposition.


Summaries of

In re Alexander v

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 24, 1991
598 A.2d 367 (Conn. 1991)
Case details for

In re Alexander v

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ALEXANDER V

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 24, 1991

Citations

598 A.2d 367 (Conn. 1991)
598 A.2d 367

Citing Cases

In re Azareon Y.

Were there sufficient indicia of incompetence in this case to have required the trial court to inquire into…

In re Alexander v

Were there sufficient indicia of incompetence in this case to have required the trial court to inquire into…