From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Alemayehu

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 10, 2014
No. 05-13-00248-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 10, 2014)

Opinion

No. 05-13-00248-CV

06-10-2014

IN RE SAMSON HADIS ALEMAYEHU, DECEASED


Affirmed and Opinion Filed June 10, 2014

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-1377-3


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Moseley, O'Neill, and FitzGerald

Opinion by Justice O'Neill

Tsion S. Mekonnen appeals the trial court's order granting Robert D. Hemphill's application to pay attorney's fees and reimburse costs in the amount of $6,961.85. This Court, by letter dated August 19, 2013, notified Mekonnen that her pro se brief did not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1 and informed her that failure to file an amended brief within ten days may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice from the Court.

Mekonnen filed a motion to extend time to file a brief on August 29, 2013. We granted the motion and ordered her to file an amended brief by October 4, 2013. Mekonnen did not file an amended brief.

We construe liberally pro se pleadings and briefs; however, we hold pro se litigants to the same standards as licensed attorneys and require them to comply with applicable laws and rules of procedure. Washington v. Bank of N.Y., 362 S.W.3d 853, 854 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012, no pet.). The law is well-established that, to present an issue to this Court, a party's brief shall contain, among other things, a concise, non-argumentative statement of facts supported by record references, and clear and concise arguments with appropriate citations to authorities and the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1; Washington, 362 S.W.3d at 854. Bare assertions of error, without argument or authority, waive error. Washington, 362 S.W.3d at 854. Thus, when a party fails to adequately brief a complaint, she waives the issue on appeal. Id.

In her "brief," Mekonnen appears to challenge the amount of attorney's fees awarded; however, she has failed to provide any argument, analysis, or authorities that make her appellate complaint viable. By failing to adequately brief her complaint, she has waived review of it. Id. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment. 130248F.P05

__________

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE

JUDGMENT

In re Samson Hadis Alemayehu, Deceased No. 05-13-00248-CV

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3,

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-1377-3.

Opinion delivered by Justice O'Neill.

Justices Moseley and FitzGerald

participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellee Robert D. Hemphill recover his costs of this appeal from appellant Tsion S. Mekonnen.

__________

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE


Summaries of

In re Alemayehu

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 10, 2014
No. 05-13-00248-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 10, 2014)
Case details for

In re Alemayehu

Case Details

Full title:IN RE SAMSON HADIS ALEMAYEHU, DECEASED

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jun 10, 2014

Citations

No. 05-13-00248-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 10, 2014)